Gun Control vs. Planned Parenthood

Discussion in '2nd Amendment' started by Hyphenated, Jan 16, 2013.

  1. Hyphenated

    Hyphenated Well-Known Member

    854
    0
    Pres. Obama paid for the death of 38 babies during the time it took him to lay out his gun control measures. Make no mistake he doesn't care about who is killing kids or he would not fund Planned Parenthood with Hundreds of Millions of Tax Payer Dollars.

    When you contact your reps. ask them...if this is about saving children why isn't defunding Planned Parenthood part of the gun control package. If they respond it is a separate issue tell them BS. Laws get bundled all the time. Make them aware you know this is not about saving kids. It's about controlling honest citizens.

    The 332,278 abortions Planned Parenthood performed over the 365 days of 2009 equals an average of 910 lives terminated per day--or about 38 per hour, or one every 95 seconds.
    Planned Parenthood, according to its most recent annual report, also received $363.2 million in government grants and contracts during its fiscal year that ended on June 30, 2009.
     
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2013
  2. greyhawk50

    greyhawk50 Well-Known Member

    1,970
    0
    This is spot on and good information.
    May I copy and use this????
     

  3. Hyphenated

    Hyphenated Well-Known Member

    854
    0
    You sure can. I didn't copyright it :rolleyes: and I don't need credit. I just want people to be aware of the hypocrisy.
     
  4. oldbrass

    oldbrass Well-Known Member

    1,362
    0
    Gun control VS planned parenthood ?? I think all children should be trained in firearms safety...
     
  5. 28Shooter

    28Shooter Well-Known Member Lifetime Supporting

    892
    5
    Leftists lack both honor and honesty. To say "it's for the children" and then fund this...how? And the "best" part, the second term hasn't even started yet!
     
  6. axxe55

    axxe55 Well-Known Member

    1,241
    0
    just about anything that comes from Obama and his administration can be considered hypocrisy and or lies.

    it has nothing to do with protecting the children in their schools but about controlling our rights and freedoms.

    his hypocrisy reached a new level when he spoke ill of the NRA for their ad in response to his statements about new gun control laws. his children go toschool with Secret Service agents who are armed in a private school with armed guards, but he opposes and ridicules the NRA for suggesting that others children don't deserve the same level of protection. hmmmm..... sounds like hypocrisy to me!

    not one measure he proposed would have prevented the CT Sandy Hook school shooting. CT already had their own AWB on the books. so where in the scheme of things is the president going to be held accountable for his actions?